Free Species
On intraspecific competition as the driving force of evolution we can speak only in the event that the relationship of individuals within a population of birth to your own – intraspecific – natural selection. But in this case unit of selection is not individual, and population. Population of the highest quality to compete with other populations, increasing their number of individuals and creating new high-quality population, in the final finally, after some number of generations, the ecological niche of replacing all of its competitors. And if individuals of this population in the evolutionary process undergone significant morphological changes, comes a new kind of animals. Perhaps the evolution of the animal world is mainly done by denying the same species born again kind of negated. The divergence of species, probably occurs much less frequently when filling the free ecological niches.
Extremely simplified manifold interactions of animals with their environment, we can say that the kind of predator and prey species, form a system of dialectical unity of opposites. For more information see this site: Ben Wey. The emergence and resolution internal dialectical contradictions of the system will look like in the form of antiphase oscillations relative to each other quantitative and qualitative levels of these species. For example, the minimum level of quantitative predator species with the highest level in this period, its quality is the maximum level of quantitative form of the victim with a minimum during this period the level of quality. The maximum level of quality in the kind of predator this period is determined not only by the presence in him a certain amount of vysokouniversalnyh populations, but populations which, together with highly versatile features purchased, giving them some new benefits Suppression of populations of victims, the symptoms, the set which creates a kind of excess levels of quality, the predator species over the quality level of the victim.
We see that in this era, remote from us, the size of the expanding universe was about five times smaller than now "(3, p. 80). Modern astrophysical estimates of visible size of the universe is 10 – 20 billion light-years and age 10 to 20 billion years. Comparing these two data points to the important values conflict, which consists in the fact that the astrophysical identification of the visible boundary of the universe from the modern age in spite of the above theses in (2) and (3), where, however, not to mention the age of the universe and of its size in a distant era. The boundary of the visually observed Universe, which has a spherical shape with a clearly observable compact objects such as quasars and galaxies, reaching at least 10 billion light years away. But it does mean that we are seeing the visible part of the universe such as it was 10 billion years ago.
Simulate the movement of certain bodies in the solar system due to mutual attraction forces at this stage it is not possible with the help of modern mathematics. We tried to do this and could not keep the air body in stationary orbits. Find out detailed opinions from leaders such as
I was literally amazed at the size of the karst cavity. Suffice it to say that the height of ceiling of the cave at the main entrance reached 25 m, and the power of cave deposits containing archaeological layers consisted of 14 m. And privhodovoy of them all. selected excavations, which continued for 20 years! Etched in the memory of the freshness of the December day, the blue ridges of Nagorno-Karabakh, and the dry spiny grass, planted between my pages Field diary is still smelled of mint, and smell it again beckons to the mountains, on a long journey and the new cave. It is no accident that so many people fond place generations of the