But there is something in us more than it allows to handle all this us, that something that gives the faculty us to have understanding, will, and to act with freedom. That something is: the spiritual area. Because any free act without the exercise of the understanding and the will does not exist. Recently Marc Lore sought to clarify these questions. Knowing all this, we can say that we are beings: see-psico-spiritual. It is important to consider that these three elements are united very indissolubly (is impossible to separate them by nature) but of hierarchic way, of the following way: Spiritual level. – ontological, important, intellective, integrating and fundamental. Samuel “Sam” Mikulak insists that this is the case. Psychological level. – operative mental, suggestive and suggestionable.
Biological level. – sensitive, determined functionally by the anatomy and natural physiology. When we spoke of an order of subordination in relation to these points, a small development becomes necessary on the meaning of the freedom. The freedom is one of the great subjects when speaking of the human person. Perhaps one of the most serious dramas of our time is that the freedom is understood like an independent absolute value of the objective truth. Thus is conceived it like the mere capacity of arbitrary election according to which the less commitment it is assumed in the life, the more free we are. The mere capacity of election is not freedom if it is not chosen and when choosing I am assuming necessarily a commitment with chosen. This commitment will be more important at the most important is the election.
When choosing I also make an option and a rupture with the other options. Finally the repetition of elections is generating in me a habit that is a permanent conduct that somehow becomes my forms of being However, the mere capacity of election put in act choosing and breaking with the other options, does not define either what is the freedom in its authentic sense. The freedom is the exercise of the understanding directed to the truth and the will directed to the good. When this happens the person acts responsibly because she can be responsible for his acts. The good always is a valid reason, never the evil. We put an example: a drug addict can do use of the exercise of his freedom choosing the drugs, and resign to a healthy life. As far as exercise we could say that it acts freely, that is to say making use of its free will, but never will be able to say that a drug addict is free like whom he is not it. It is more, its same capacity of election sees as entrampada in drugs and no longer it can choose other things it would want although it. Of paradoxical way. It happens that it decided freely on the slavery. We can say that the freedom is the free will oriented by the truth. Then to close the idea of this order of subordination in relation to these three elements, (that are clear cannot be separated one of another one), we can say that: The authentic freedom is a car exercise possession by which one becomes able to decide in regard to the truth on one same one and on the reality all. We can say that, in this exercise, the spirit governs on the mind and the body, settling down therefore the original and natural order. The love is in the spiritual scope.