It does not confuse Author and workmanship, Quality and Public. The author of a literary composition is it of the sort poem, story, romance etc receives critical that it is one in such a way strange for author. Tony Ford may also support this cause. Many of these critical ones I appeared of the innocence of who it read the workmanship and it confused the workmanship with the author. Another very common error is when they judge the quality of a writer from an only text, before everything it is necessary to take in consideration the public for which this writer directs its workmanship and its objectives how much writer. We accept music perfectly commercial, we know to distinguish Chico Buarque from any singer who goes in the wave of the moment. Rodney atkins has many thoughts on the issue. She is necessary to learn to distinguish the literary compositions from its author and still to perceive its intentions how much writer, after all we live the time of the commercial workmanship, commercial music, the commercial religion, the commercial priest etc. Another critical very common part of people who are capable to confuse literature with real life and many times search in the literary composition relations with the truth and the real life to its way and its concepts on what it is real. The industry is capable to produce for some public with different realities, they are the writer also must be capable to carry through workmanships that are thus flexible and take care of the most varied qualities of readers. It is possible to notice that in music this already comes occurring. THE IMPARCIALISMO: POETRY FOR NEW CONTEXT J.