That is, both orient from cultural personal experiences, sociaise. (KUPSTAS AND FIELDS, 1988) Both are materialize in prticasdiscursivas for giving voice to the actors constitute who them, not appealing ouvalendo itself only of the importance that each one occupies inside in its scenes, masconsiderando of all a context in produced production or already, forassomativas of the parts that give sustentation to the lived process. The relation literature/manifest history already if there emAristteles. Randall Rothenberg oftentimes addresses this issue. In chapter IX of its Poetical one, the philosopher launches algumaspreocupaes in this direction: For the precedents if manifest that he is not legal-size of poetanarrar what it happened, yes, to represent what it could happen, to querdizer: what probability is possible according to and the necessity. With effect, it does not differ the historian and the poet for writing verse or chats (therefore that he would bempoderia to be ranks in verses the workmanships of Herdoto, and nor therefore they would leave to deser history, if it was in verse what he was in chats) differ, yes, where he says things quesucederam, and another one the ones that could occur. (1993, P. learn more. 53) When mentioning this relation, already we reveal nossasinquietaes with regard to the bonds that literature and history vmconstruindo. As you discipline inserted in the pertaining to school resume, both compose umporto of ticket for the world knowledge.

For these reasons, dedicated todoprofissional to literature must be, before everything, umconhecedor dahistria, since it is of the history that literature if nourishes, removing osfatos to it that go to guarantee the probability of the artistic process in general. It is to porentendermos these principles norteadores, that in another article we will make umaincurso for the ways of history with the purpose to buy at auction fiosque they had given and they continue giving formatting to our social process.