I ask Diego said this was Communist, or are depriving Yankee system and traffickers of art of your mask? the only thing certain for me is that my, as I said before these works let me absolutely indifferent, I do not see there nothing, but absolutely nothing, not to be material waste that is job in making such batidillo. In his article on the so-called generation of the rupture, Luis Carlos Emerich, talks, on the neutral art. Looking for a little of Luz I am not, right, left, or Center, I am only a poor painter confused looking for some light, to continue doing my little monkeys a little better and put them in the history of the art, i.e., in this historical process, which I played live, so is that I, I ask again does that is Jackson Pollock artist more expensive? or are we going to ask the question in another way; Jackson Pollck is the most expensive is the better? I say damn! which is it? I earlier already wrote something about these things, but now that I stumbled upon these writings by Diego Rivera, which is indeed still the painter more popular in Mexico, was reborn in my question; does that Pollock is the? most expensive artist? Diego response is good, at least to me, so seems at this time. Returning to the issue in particular are going to suppose that only we have a dog-eared marketing stunt to draw attention to an artist to inflate and give a prestige that has no, because so are the the called Dealers, they often invent this kind of thing, I already tube about bitter experiences with these gentlemen. As I said before, I’m not right or left, and I don’t have anything against the United States, if the so-called painter more expensive in the world outside Chinese, my question would remain the same, for that is the most expensive? would like to make that very clear. $I step, I don’t play the game of the art, thank you! * or relevant links: Number 5, Jackson Pollock Alberto Thirion original Autor and source of the article..