Gunter Zielinski – accountant from Hamburg informed since many years I am working as a tax consultant in Hamburg and so far barely a year later, in which several of my clients experienced a nasty surprise when they opened the tax bill of the tax office. The refunds were much too low or incredibly high payments were required. I would like to describe how such deviations from the expected result of the tax assessment notice come about and what you can do, at this point. Incorrect tax bills are surprisingly common. Numerous clients with this problem find my tax firm year after year. According to current statistics, about 35 to 40 percent of all tax bills are flawed, produced by the German tax authorities. Nine out of ten cases, the financial management at the expense of the taxpayer is wrong! Incorrect tax bills come due to the following factors: the competent tax office has a different opinion to the legal assessment of the facts of the case. The IRS has an error in the Recording tax return made, due to its important aspects not or incorrectly taken into account were.
The tax issue is newly judged according to the current jurisdiction of the German, the Federal Constitutional Court or the European Court of Justice. Reaches the competent tax office to a different legal judgment on important matters, arises the question of why this is so. Missing evidence and deficiencies in the presentation of the facts of the case are possible causes on the part of the taxpayer. It is also possible that it the IRS not only incorrectly, or it is possible to understand the controversial facts. The taxpayer has the option to insert a reasoned, written objection against the tax assessment in such cases. This must be done within a one-month period after the notification of the decision.continue reading
8 pre-defined sample letters to the Schufa delete best lawyer German black on white you will learn not only everything important about your powerful opponent, the SCHUFA, but also how you can force it to its knees. It’s already formulated above in eight different pattern letters, you must take over. For example: Request on an incorrect message to the SCHUFA delete request on a disputed claim in the SCHUFA delete request on delete in the SCHUFA about one less than 1,000 application eligible claim on delete from the list of debtors, etc. This although the deadline may have long passed and with the knowledge of the E-book “How to delete your negative Schufa entries!” can be reached a deletion of the data within a few Tagen(!) – is. One of the best lawyer German pattern writing tells us the legally safe trick. The SCHUFA to delete the entry.
Content: Preface, who is the Schufa? Which one Processes the Schufa data? What saves the Schufa you? What is the so-called Schufa clause? What is the so-called Schufa-scoring method? To whom does the Schufa data? The Schufa positively represents what is dangerous to the Schufa? How long does the Schufa data store? You do the problematic hard cases”what can? Know your data! Sample letter: Request for free information such as the charge is justified? Analyze the data the negative entries hard negative entries sample letter: cancellation of debtor directory (in court) sample letter: delete Schufa entry WG. Debtor directory sample letter: withdrawal an incorrect message to the Schufa soft negative entries sample letter: cancellation by an incorrect entry sample letter: cancellation of the entry of a disputed claim by sample letter: revocation of a legitimate entry under 1,000 other entries afterword sample letter: cancellation of the Schufa Schufa Klause-full 60 days money back guarantee! If you my report don’t like it, then they get refunded the full purchase price from me. Simply send me an email. Successful and effective methods show how everyone can delete his (even legitimate) Schufa entries. All success paths to the Schufa delete entry in this guide have been tried by people like you and me, usually made of totally desperate situations – and they were often very surprised by their own success! There’s no magic behind it, but simply the application of completely legal Schufa delete success recipes.continue reading
The lawyers inform Dittenheber & Werner from Munich on the 04.05.2011 was the German Federal Supreme Court found that the interest of a parent on an initial training may weigh heavier, as the purchase obligation to the children (BGH XII ZR 70/09). The law firm Dittenheber & Werner Munich family law specialists inform the judgment. Parents are obliged to maintain their minor children. To the satisfaction of the claim to child maintenance, it must take all reasonable, take, for example, also backup and auxiliary. Against this background, a unterhaltsverpflichteter father of the child against the mother of the children complained. She had taken their initial vocational training at the age of 30 years and was therefore no longer able to deny their share of the child support. The desires of the father of the child reflected the conflict between the interest in vocational training and the right of children to maintenance.
Negotiated dispute was not disputed that the remuneration of the vocational training in While exercise of an ancillary activity not sufficient would, to comply with the obligation to pay maintenance. So, the Supreme Court had to decide whether the inclusion of initial vocational training is more important than the right of children to maintenance. The judicial courts had not followed the requests of the applicant father and also the German Federal Supreme Court made no exception. In continuation of a BGH decision of 1993 (BGH XII ZR 172/92) was the 12th Civil Chamber, that vocational training forms part of the debtor mother of the child’s life needs. This was primarily to evaluate, so the Federal Court of Justice in its judgment against the interests of the children living. However, the interests would have to be weighed against by parents and children in each individual case. The balance in the favor of the child’s mother was in the negotiated lawsuit. After the early birth of the children she was active in various working conditions, a low economic efficiency with pronounced installed would have.
The inclusion of a training as a retail clerk is, regardless their age of 30 years, suitable to increase their performance in the future and to ensure that the child support. The training recording cannot be objectionable from maintenance-legal point of view. The judgment of the Federal Court of Justice shows that the maintenance obligations towards children before a legitimate life needs to retire. When this is the case, determined according to the circumstances of each individual case. To achieve this the best possible implementation of own needs and interests, family law matters should be accompanied by an experienced legal counsel. The law firm Dittenheber & Werner Munich family law specialists are your clients at all times with help and advice.continue reading